Conant Foundation     THE CONANT FOUNDATION
           
  Skip Navigation Links
Home
News
Medical News
Research
Expand Research
Lectures
Expand Lectures
About Us
Board of Directors
Expand Board of Directors
Care and Treatment
Sculptra® For Lipodystrophy
Epidemiology
AIDS History in San Francisco
Advocacy
Expand Advocacy
Recent Accomplishments
Links and Resources
Newsletter
Expand Newsletter
Contact Us
Search The Website
   

Advocacy


	HyperLink

No. 03-40
Title:
John P. Walters, Director, White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, et al., Petitioners
v.
Marcus Conant, et al.
Docketed: July 7, 2003
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  Case Nos.: (00-17222)
  Decision Date: October 29, 2002
  Rehearing Denied: February 6, 2003

Conant vs. Walters -- the full text version with hypertext links to referenced articles.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCUS CONANT, Dr.; DONALD NORTHFELT, Dr.; DEBU TRIPATHY, Dr.; NEIL FLYNN, Dr.; STEPHEN POLLANSBEE, Dr.; STEPHEN O’BRIEN, Dr.; MILTON ESTES, Dr.; JO DALY; KEITH VINES; JUDITH CUSHNER; VALERIE CORRAL; BAY AREA PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS; BEING ALIVE: PEOPLE WITH AIDS/ HIV ACTION COALITION, INC.; HOWARD MCCABEE; DANIEL KANE; 
ALLAN FLACH, Dr.,
  Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

 

JOHN P. WALTERS,*, Director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy; ASA HUTCHINSON,** Administrator, US DEA; JOHN ASHCROFT,*** Attorney General of the United States;

No. 00-17222

D.C. No.
CV-97-00139-WHA

OPINION


What does Conant mean for doctors and health care professionals?

Doctors CAN:

  • Discuss, fully and candidly, the risks and benefits of medical marijuana with patients.
  • Recommend (or Approve, Endorse, Suggest, or Advise, etc.), in accordance with their medical judgment, marijuana for patient use. 
  • Record in their patients’ charts discussions about and recommendations of medical marijuana.
  • Sign a government form or otherwise inform state or local officials that they have recommended medical marijuana for particular patients.
  • Testify in court or through written declaration about recommending medical marijuana for a certain patient.
  • Educate themselves about the medical benefits of marijuana, its various clinical applications, and different routes of ingestion.

Doctors CANNOT:

  • Prescribe medical marijuana.  This includes writing a recommendation on an Rx form.
  • Assist patients in obtaining marijuana. 
  • Cultivate or possess marijuana for patient use.
  • Physically assist patients in using marijuana.
  • Recommend marijuana without a justifiable medical cause.

Walters v. Conant: Marcus Conant, M.D. - Lead Plaintiff

Dr. Conant currently treats at least 100 patients for whom he believes marijuana is a medically appropriate form of treatment for nausea and loss of appetite in AIDS patients. - ACLU Drug Law Reform Project Marijuana Law Reform



	HyperLink

Conant v. McCaffrey is, at its core, a case about doctors’ ability to give advice and recommendations to patients suffering from serious and debilitating illnesses.



	HyperLink

Order Granting Plaintiffs Motions for Preliminary Injunction Class Certification; Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss



	HyperLink

This information provided by the Office of the State Public Health Officer. Dr. Marcus Conant, et. al., v. John P. Walters, et. al.

This October 29, 2002, decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision that the US Government could not punish physicians for voicing their professional opinions based on their best medical judgment (Conant v. McCaffrey, September 7, 2000). The Court of Appeals decision upholds the First Amendments rights of physicians who recommend the use of medical marijuana for their patients.


US Supreme Court Allows MDs to Recommend Marijuana

Washington DC, Oct. 15th 2003. In a major victory for Prop. 215, the Supreme Court let stand a Ninth Circuit ruling protecting doctors from punishment for recommending marijuana as medicine. The court turned down the administration’s request for a hearing to appeal an injunction by the U.S. District Court in San Francisco barring the government from punishing doctors who recommend marijuana by revoking their licenses to prescribe controlled substances or by other sanctions.

The case, Conant v. Walters (previously McCaffrey), was decided on freedom of speech grounds. The Ninth Circuit ruled that physicians have a "core First Amendment" right "to speak frankly and openly with their patients." However, the court’s decision does not allow doctors to aid and abet patients in procuring marijuana, for example, by referring them to a cannabis dispensary.


 
             
     

470 Castro Street, Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94114

 

HIV Medicine

Phone (415) 255-0806

 

HIV/AIDS/STD Research

Fax (415) 255-0799

 

Clinical Research

info@conantfoundation.org

 

Education

Map For The Foundation

© 2008 The Conant Foundation

Advocacy